Talk:Lansweeper
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 21 October 2019. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
}}
Article prune
editGiven connected contributors seem to have respectfully ceased to add to the article and added a COI I may attempt to prune it as an independent particularly rebasing on some of the newer non primary references. I'll probably switch to WP:LDR as it is a technique I use which helps me manage citations in an article rescue and switch back afterwards if anyone needs me to if it survives. If that gives anyone problems let me know. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:28, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
I have worked over references and belive there is enough WP:RS for article to survive. I will now begin to prune/re-write the article as seems fit. I know I will start but pruning some bits I don't want to include .. I will then pause and then begin to prune/re-write some more. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:21, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
- My current thought is I will create new sections and at the appropriate point remove the previous ones, and also re-write the lede at some point, sourcing throughout. That should eliminate the paid editing concerns. (There may be normal) disputes with my editing. This is likely a couple of elapsed days, possibly longer. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 13:48, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
- In order for me to be comfortable for a (successful) keep vote at AfD I feel like I have to do a hard prune ... but retaining key references. If those with COI them wish changes there is the Wikipedia:Edit requests procedure. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 18:30, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Removal of Template:Undisclosed paid
editI believe I have reworked out all content that has been contributed by paid edited (perhaps bar say trivia in Infobox such as version number). Per WP:CLEANUPTAG and Wikipedia:Tagging pages for problems these are not meant to be a permanent shame mark on an article or topic. I therefore believe as at Old revision of Lansweeper
- The Template:Undisclosed paid should be removed.
- The connected contributor can be marked as checked as no connected contributor content remains at
In may be in doing so it is felt my good faith contributions are for instance non neutral and perhaps in good faith to someone the resulting content looks like an advert or by point of view was non neutral in which case alternative tagging might be considered. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:33, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Per WP:TC the template has been removed as effectively eliminated. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 06:36, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Edits from connected editors
editEdits from users who per WP:DUCK may have a connection with subject will be reverted. However requests on this talkpage for changes will be respected, if necessary by WP:REQUESTEDIT. For example [1]. (And please note the chance of any argument to get Template:Undisclosed paid removed would be scuppered if that edit made by that editor were allowed to remain) Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 03:57, 30 October 2019 (UTC)