Talk:Lantian Man/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by SilverTiger12 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SilverTiger12 (talk · contribs) 19:15, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply


Greetings. I have little experience at GAN so this may not be considered enough to pass it, but I will do my best.

Nitpicking

edit
  • "characteristic of the Acheulean industry which is usually" comma after Acheulean? It reads a little oddly without one.
done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:33, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • It was formally described by Chinese palaeoanthropologist Woo Ju-Kan" Maybe say "The fossil was...", as the immediately preceding sentence is about the location, not the fossil.
done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  20:33, 24 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "Chenchiawo yielded the dhole,..." Yielded is rather odd phrasing here.
features?
That works.
  • "In 2018, Zhu and colleagues reported stone tools 2.1 million years ago at the Shangchen site" Surely they did not report stone tools 2.1 millions years ago... maybe change to 2.1 million years old?
done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  21:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "Lantian Man is a spectacle for the Shaanxi History Museum." This changes from past tense (in the previous part of the sentence) to present tense, which reads very strangely. Maybe change to "was a spectacle".
that would imply it's not there anymore   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  21:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Is there a way to say that it's still there without changing tenses, though? I.e. "it became a spectacle at the Shaanxi History Museum."
done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  02:53, 29 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

GA Critereon

edit
  • Verifiable - yes, and all the sources look suitable.
  • Well-written - see nitpicks Yes.
  • Coverage - yes, it covers the whole of the topic.
  • NPOV - yes.
  • Images - copyright looks fine.
See WP:GAN/I#PASS   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  12:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
I'm not exactly an experienced reviewer, is it okay for me to just pass it? --SilverTiger12 (talk) 12:41, 29 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
I guess I just pass it, then. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 19:42, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply