"Titian's painting was a copy of a work of the same title by Rubens"

edit

Unlikely, as R born some decades after T died - other way round maybe? Johnbod (talk) 16:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Correct. As far as I can tell, Rubens is not involved here. However, the entire article needs cites, and research. For starters, the accepted date of completion seems to have been moved to the 1640s. JNW (talk) 19:06, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

It does, although the 1996 Prado catalogue still goes with 1657. Johnbod (talk) 19:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Interesting. So there really is still a difference in opinion among scholars. More fun for when the article gets a makeover. JNW (talk) 19:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply