Talk:Lascar (volcano)/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anne drew Andrew and Drew (talk · contribs) 14:26, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

1. Well written
   • Prose: Y Very well written and informative. No issues here.
   • Style: Y Great
2. Verifiable
   • Citations: Y no formatting issues that I can see
   • Reliable sources: Y Well sourced
   • No Original Research: Y good here
3. Broad in coverage
   • All major aspects: Y All major details covered
   • No unnecessary detail: Y Good to see that the town distance table has been replaced with an image as requested in GA1. No more issues here.
4. Neutral point of view: Y All good
5. Stable: Y No edit warring
6. Images: Y Very well illustrated, no copyvio issues. Even includes a Commons Picture of the Year.
7. Pass/Fail: Pass! Thanks for your contributions.

• Comment: Great work on this article - almost featured quality. Happy to pass.