Talk:Lashkar-e-Jhangvi

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Comment

edit

I dont see why this article is tagged as biased. From what i know of the matter, it seems fairly accurate to me.

I agree. Odd to tag the article as disupted when in fact there is no dispute on the talk page. I'll remove the tag... 69.228.89.226
edit

At some point, this page was directly copied and pasted from another source. Since then, several edits have occurred and it is now very difficult to differentiate original material and material directly copied. --RDavi404 (talk) 01:59, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. --CactusWriter | needles 22:21, 26 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Two sources - Same information

edit

Two different sources are almost identical. This piece from the Kashmir Herald, dated February 2003, mirrors the LeJ profile from the South Asia Terrorism Portal. The SATP article isn't really clear on publishing dates but includes a list of detailed list of acts that the Kashmir Herald lacks.

This issue is outside the scope of Wikipedia; it is a matter for the two sources involved to settle. I just wanted to point out a possible plagiarism issue among references.--RDavi404 (talk) 13:08, 18 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Why is this page listed under the Deobandi Movement. The page has no references to the Deobandi movement at all what so ever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.97.208.217 (talk) 12:09, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lashkar-e-Jhangvi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:44, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lashkar-e-Jhangvi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 11 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lashkar-e-Jhangvi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply