Talk:Lathyrus sativus

This species has so many common names worldwide that I think it most appropriate that it be listed under its botanical name --nixie 13:28, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, please undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tag these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was paid to avoid any incorrect tagging of categories, but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns, please write on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 19:06, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Poisonous??

Would it not be prudent to mention it is poisonous if eaten over a long period somewhere near the top of the page? Perhaps next to where it says "human consumption". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.12.32 (talk) 16:26, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Right. This article makes it look like food. It is a horrible, insidious poison.

It is a food, but it is a dangerous food to eat for a prolonged period, and the current volume of research frequently deals with this aspect of the plant, so, per your comments, I added a sentence to the introductory paragraph. Feel free to edit it yourself. --AfadsBad (talk) 23:38, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

International Year of Pulses

It would be a worthy goal of the International Year of Pulses if resources could be brought to breeding types of this food crop without the toxins. Lathyrus sativus without toxin could reduce hunger and protein deficiency in the Third World. Nuggets of Knowledge (talk) 09:07, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lathyrus sativus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041117122951/http://www.ipbo.ugent.be/Ourresearch/Lathyrus.html to http://www.ipbo.ugent.be/Ourresearch/Lathyrus.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:26, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

See also

Can anyone explain the relevance of the link to Kinako under See also? OK, so it is another flour from a legume, but other than that I think it should be deleted. JeremyCherfas (talk) 09:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC)