Talk:Laurent Eketebi

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Laurent Eketebi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Willbb234 (talk · contribs) 06:07, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Punctuation needs work - lots of missing commas, but this is not part of the criteria

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Well references with several books and other sources. Copyvio detector showed up nothing

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Whilst the article doesn’t cover everything in detail, it covers the main aspects and is continually focused on the subject

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Lacking important images but not a reason to fail

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Needs a little bit of work with punctuation, but good in quality and well referenced. Well done

Image

I think this photograph was published in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and hence would be in the public domain. Am I correct?--Le Petit Chat (talk) 08:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

@Le Petit Chat: I’m inclined to agree, but I know only the basics regarding copyright. Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 08:19, 1 September 2019 (UTC)