Talk:Laurinburg, North Carolina

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

It is requested that a photograph of Laurinburg be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in North Carolina may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

The first line: "Laurinburg is a very beautiful city to live in or to visit. Its residents are nice and calm and ethnically diverse. Laurinburg residents show pride in what their beautiful city means to them" sounds like an advertisement. NPOV please. Kktor 00:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Kktor 03:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

"For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 74.7 males." What does that mean? Was this supposed to say "males over 18"? The ratio of females over 18 to all males seems a pointless piece of information because of _course_ the ratio will climb if you're just talking about women over 18 vs. all males. This needs to be either corrected or removed, I think.TechsysPete (talk) 22:21, 27 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Also, the demographic information is outdated. I'm going to come back later to correct this, but if someone wants to do it now... TechsysPete (talk) 22:23, 27 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Laurinburg, North Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20160602200744/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:28, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic