Talk:Lavochkin La-152/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Sp33dyphil in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sp33dyphil (talk · contribs) 03:19, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- "name - Type" replace hyphen with dash
- Sure.
- Replace "U.S.S.R." with "Soviet Union" no links
- Sure
- Are there any reason why "4" shouldn't be spelled out in full?
- MOS for infoboxes is to use the digits in all cases.
- "Lavochkin Design Bureau (OKB)" --> "Lavochkin Design Bureau (OKB)"
- Please spell "150", "152", as "La-150"
- Using 150 etc. is my attempt to bypass nomenclature issues dealing with the bullshit La-X or the proper Izdeliye name as used by the OKB. I've reluctantly used La-152 in the lede and in references to other articles, but won't use it again.
- Does this use Am Eng? If yes, cancelled should be canceled.
- Fixed
- "In the meantime" --> "Meanwhile"
- Good idea.
- "versions of the RD-10
in an effortto increase the engine's power."- Done.
- "340
kilograms-forcekgf" please standardise throughout article- This is an issue with the template which is set up only for kN. Do you want me to manually convert them all to kN?
- Yes, kN seems to be used for widely. Sp33dyphil © • © 05:51, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- "Aircraft 156" shouldn't it be "La-156"
- No, it shouldn't.
- Link "ejection seat" and "Soviet Air Forces"
- Done.
- I suggest link "Tushino flypast as "Tushino flypast"
- Tushino is a place so I think it's worth keeping the link.
- Please re-link "Rolls-Royce Derwent V" as "Rolls-Royce Derwent V", or have I missed something?
- I don't know why this matters, but whatever. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:27, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- Please add caption of the first pic. Please add alt text.
- Caption added, alt text not required.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:38, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- If you don't, I will. I'll spend a few minutes so some vision-impaired people can at least get an idea of what they're supposed to be looking at. Sp33dyphil © • © 06:41, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- Caption added, alt text not required.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:38, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: