Talk:Law of Citations

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

When was the Law of Citations made Obsolete?

edit

There are clear signs that by the time Justinian was codifying Roman law, the Law of Citations no longer would have had force. In the first place, the procedure that Justinian used for creating the Digest was clearly not preferential to certain jurists. Secondly, the Corpus became the only source of law. I can find reference to the fact that the first edition of the Codex included the Law of Citations, but I can find no indication that it was included in the second edition. If it was not included in the second edition, is it possible that the Law of Citations had no further use? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natures Colours (talkcontribs) 21:14, 2 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Law of Citations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:53, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply