Talk:Law of Guarantees
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lisbon Treaty
editThe article should really consider looking into whether the new European super-state created by the Lisbon Treaty would have the power to annul the Lateran Treaty and return to an earlier form of agreement which existed under the law of Guarantees. This question appears to be relevant because of the European Court of Human Rights' recent interference in Italian Church-State relations, in which the court wrote that all crucifixes had to be removed from Italian public schools. ADM (talk) 08:52, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Does this need to be a separate article?
editDoes this need to be a separate article or can we make into a subsection of either the Roman Question or the Prisoner of the Vatican article (unless those two merge)? We can make it a section entitled "Law of Guarantees" and have redirects point to that section. Then in one easy swoop we have both a substantial background and response sections. --Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 05:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
- I think it does not need to be a separate article. I have been bold and merged it with Roman Question. Esoglou (talk) 15:58, 9 August 2013 (UTC)