This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
to be in line with the others, wouldn't it be lawa river (Asia)? Aren't Africa and south America more widely spread than Indonesia? Anyway, precedence is not important. --Merbabu (talk) 14:54, 26 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
The subject is a geographical entity, rather than political. The other two are named along with the landmass they run across. Are there any reasons for keeping it as Indonesia rather than Borneo? A river in Indonesia could be on any of a dozen landmasses...whereas Borneo is quite specific. Night w (talk) 04:24, 27 January 2010 (UTC)Reply