Talk:Lawrence Hargrave

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Mclure's images

edit

The artist drawing are nice, but completely inaccurate - they show the box elements as side by side, where the phototgraph clearly shows that they are front and back. I'd like to remove them unless someone objects Clappingsimon talk 02:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC)Reply


You're right about the drawings being inaccurate. I'd hate to see them go, though, as they provide historical contest (even to the point of showing how inaccurate the public perception was of Hargrave's work). The note in the captions seems like a reasonable compromise.

75.144.4.89 08:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Tom place when hargrve had kids if he was married and when his wifes and his parents diedReply


As someone looking for information on the kites, I think the pictures of how they DON'T look (and work) are pretty confusing. Are there no pictures showing what they did look like? Come on, you "experts"!

Date of death

edit

If you Google "Lawrence Hargrave July 1915", you get far more hits for a death on 6 July 1915 than 14 July 1915. So the majority is for 6 July. Yet our primary source, ADB, and various others, say 14 July. Is it possible he died on 6 July and was buried on 14 July? Could the normally impeccable ADB be wrong? Any thoughts, anyone? -- JackofOz (talk) 08:52, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hudson Shaw & Ruhen says "... Peritonitus set in and they kept him under Morphia till he died on 6 July 1915" Clappingsimon talk 12:38, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
That's just the problem, though. Many sources SAY he died on this date or that date, but how do we know which is the accurate one? There are far too many going for both dates to just dismiss one of them on the basis of a typo or whatever. Is there a source that discusses the discrepancy and explains how the wrong date (whichever one it is) got into the literature? I've looked extensively but haven't found one. By the way, if Hudson Shaw & Ruhen really spells peritonitis as "Peritonitus", I'd be wary of their lack of attention to detail. -- JackofOz (talk) 13:02, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Also, your edit changed the date to 6 July in the lead, but it still says 14 July later in the article. Which brings us back to square one, and exactly why I started checking this issue out in the first place. -- JackofOz (talk) 13:06, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
OK, after a night's sleep, I’ve been doing a bit of digging around our sources. You say Hudson Shaw & Ruhen (1977) says "... he died on 6 July 1915". The original ADB article (Percival Serle, 1949) also uses 6 July. But Amirah Inglis in the most recent ADB (1983) says 14 July. He/she in fact uses Hudson Shaw & Ruhen as one of their own sources, so they must have had a good reason to go against 6 July and prefer 14 July. They had access to the Hargrave papers in the National Library. This seems to be the most up-to-date serious biography of Hargrave, so I’m going with the 14th July as his death date. I’ll put a note in that some sources say 6 July. -- JackofOz (talk) 22:10, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
I've checked the digitised newspapers of the National Library and its definitely reported as him dying on 6 July 1915 - eg Melbourne Argus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.50.195 (talk) 12:36, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
OK, that settles it. Unless he did a Mark Twain, his death was reported on 7 July 1915 as having occurred the previous day, 6 July. Belated thanks. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 00:06, 3 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Citation required

edit

The "Workers must root out the idea that by keeping the results..." quote needs a source.Steven noble (talk) 00:59, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.178.22.207 (talk) 00:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply 

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Lawrence Hargrave/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

this artical about lawrence hargrave is good althrogh it needs more infomation bout his family .

Last edited at 07:27, 11 August 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 21:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lawrence Hargrave. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:17, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lawrence Hargrave. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

"Retired with a moderate competency"?

edit

I'm puzzled by this phrase. Does this mean he retired with a pension, or that he was only barely adequate at his job by the time he finished with it?