Talk:Lay It All on Me (song)
Latest comment: 8 years ago by BD2412 in topic Requested move 24 January 2016
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lay It All on Me (song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move 24 January 2016
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
No consensus to move, after extended discussion. bd2412 T 05:03, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
– WP:TWODABS situation. The album has no artwork, chart positions or references and seems barely even notable enough for an article at all. Unreal7 (talk) 12:30, 24 January 2016 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 07:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose like most of these cases, the dab was incomplete - there are 4 other songs mentioned in articles. Lay It All on Me (Rudimental song) isn't greatly more significant than other 2015 song. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:04, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Yes it is. Why do you never get that existence does not mean the same as notability? Why do you never acknowledge facts... Unreal7 (talk) 09:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- It is massively more significant than anything else of this title. "Than other 2015 song"? What does that even mean? Unreal7 (talk) 16:25, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per above -- 70.51.200.135 (talk) 07:09, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per Primary Topic which says that there may not be a primary topic, rather than a unequivocal must and continues with, "A topic is primary for a term, with respect to long-term significance, if it has substantially greater enduring notability and educational value than any other topic associated with that term". A 2015 song has not proven long-term significance. The disambiguation page states there are 7 search results for Lay It All on Me, I would be surprised if there are not more. --Richhoncho (talk) 12:12, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support. Clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC in a WP:TWODABS situation. None of the other topics on the dab page have articles or more than a mention in any other article.--Cúchullain t/c 20:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support, the song is unquestionably the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Look at the page views. LOL! What a no-brainer. There is no comparison[1]. 377 per day avg in January vs. 2 (yes two) per day. --В²C ☎ 03:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- I'll support, considering the album with the same name has lower importance than this song. 2601:8C:4001:DCF4:4544:7CE:D190:5ADB (talk) 21:51, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.