This article needs attention...Etbebl (talk) 21:41, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- i agree --DerekvG (talk) 13:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- To be specific, I don't know what the second paragraph under the second section is saying, and there's also some grammatical stuff. Lythronaxargestes (talk) 01:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Update: I've reworked the article quite a bit, but it is still quite vague. Additional citations and clarifications are needed. Lythronaxargestes (talk) 01:47, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Proposed merge
editI propose to merge Laypeople here, since it is merely the plural of "lay person" and all the links on the list are merely kinds of lay person. bd2412 T 01:35, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support - There's no point in having a separate article for the plural version. However, Laypeople is acting as a disambiguation page for the various versions of laypeople. I suggest that the resulting Lay person (or Layperson) article should also be marked as a dab page. I worked through the list from the March Dabchallenge and found a majority of the links should be changed to Laity rather than Layperson. PKT(alk) 15:47, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. See also WP:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015_February_15#Layman, where I first mentioned inconsistencies with various "lay man" redirects. Si Trew (talk) 06:06, 28 May 2015 (UTC)