Talk:Lazar the Serb/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by 23 editor in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 23 editor (talk · contribs) 20:07, 4 July 2013 (UTC) I'll get to this shortly.Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    The ISBN on the Gordana Tošić and Milutin Tadić ref needs fixing
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
    What does Isidore the Russian monk who invented vodka have to do with the content of the article? If nothing, then he should be removed from the "See also" section.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: On hold
See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout at "See also"–"the links in the 'See also' section should be relevant, should reflect the links that would be present in a comprehensive article on the topic, and should be limited to a reasonable number." Besides that, everything seems fine. Passed. Good job. 23 editor (talk) 09:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC)Reply