Talk:Lazarus (Travie McCoy album)

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Basilisk4u in topic GA Review
Good articleLazarus (Travie McCoy album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 12, 2011Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lazarus (Travie McCoy album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AJona1992 (talk) 20:17, 9 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

General notes

edit
Lead

Comment: I am not sure what the difference is, the two links redirect to the same page. What do you mean? Basilisk4u (talk) 17:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • 06. "positive to mixed" to "mixed to positive"   Done. Basilisk4u (talk) 17:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • 07. Per WP:Lead which states "The lead serves both as an introduction to the article and as a summary of its most important aspects". Please consider adding the major aspects of the article.

Secondary notes

edit
Lead

Number four hasn't been addressed. I am pretty sure it was the lead single (especially if it was the first single released). Number five; I see where you are coming from. What I meant was, were these promotional singles or just singles? (there is a difference).

Comment: I think that they were just singles, as they were released several months after the release of the album and they were not released to create a buzz for the album. Is that okay? Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Background
Recording and production
Music
Lyrics
Packaging and title
Release and promotion
Chart performance
Critical reception
Chart performance

Final notes

edit

This article needs a bit of help. I am going to put it   On hold for further development, up to seven (7) days. Please address the concerns that were stated. Take care and good luck, AJona1992 (talk) 16:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your suggestions! I believe I have addressed everything. Please let me know if there is anything else I should do. Basilisk4u (talk) 02:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your fast response! I'm currently going to re-read the article to make sure that everything has been taking care of, AJona1992 (talk) 03:09, 12 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Chart performance
  • 01. "number 11 on the Billboard Digital Albums charts" - number 11 needs to be spelled out ---> number eleven.


This is the only concern. Just fix this and the article passes, AJona1992 (talk) 03:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Done :D Basilisk4u (talk) 03:28, 12 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Passed the article. Congrats! AJona1992 (talk) 03:31, 12 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Awesome! Thanks so much :) Basilisk4u (talk) 01:00, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply