Talk:Lazarus Aaronson/GA1

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Sainsf in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 15:01, 27 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Will review this. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 15:01, 27 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Lead

edit
  • Can Christianity, economics and coronary heart disease be wikilinked?
    • Wikilinked coronary heart disease. Would consider it wp:overlinking to link the other two very well known and general terms.
  • widespread recognition he gained --> widespread recognition, he gained
    • Changed.

Life

edit
  • Can tuberculosis, diabetes, socialist, economics, City of London College and coronary heart disease be wikilinked? No problem in repeating links from the lead.
    • Linked all, except socialist and economics
  • which occurred on 9 July 1938 "took place" would look better.
    • Well spotted. Changed.
  • She subsequently married the geriatrician Oscar Olbrich Does this need to be included?
    • Good point. Removed.
  • 1958/59 I think "or" is better than dash, if that is the meaning.
    • Clarified this.
  • more than twenty-five years Numbers equal to or greater than 10 are typically kept in digits.
    • I think letters works in this instance as we are talking about a general more than twenty-five years, rather than a exact number of years.

Poetry

edit
  • What is "left-leaning"?
    • "sympathetic to or tending towards the left in politics." The same word is used by the source to describe The Age
  • Can Christianity, Jew be wikilinked?
    • Not sure. I would probably consider that to be overlinking.
  • Duplink: Isaac Rosenberg
    • Might be worth linking twice, as there is som distance between the two mentions?
  • Some of his works also appeared in journals and in anthologies such as the 1953 Faber Book of Twentieth Century Verse. Source?
    • Fixed
  • Little scholarly attention have been "has been"?
    • Fixed
  • Who are Jacobs and Baker? Have they been introduced anywhere by their full names?
    • Introduced earlier in the section by full name.

That should be all. A bit busy now, I think I will be able to get to this only by the end of this week. Cheers! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 18:40, 27 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much for reviewing. I will try to adress all points. Cheers –P. S. Burton (talk) 01:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Hi, found time for this today. Excellent, all issues resolved. I am happy to promote this. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 05:59, 28 March 2016 (UTC)Reply