Talk:Le Château de la Belle au Bois Dormant

Amusement Parks: Walt Disney Parks and Resorts Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Walt Disney Parks and Resorts task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Disney Mid‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've read through the article and think it should NOT be merged with the article describing the traditional Disney Sleeping Beauty Castle.

The article for this castle clearly explains how (and why) this castle is not the same as one of the "Sleeping Beauty" castles, and in fact, great effort was given to consider how it would and should be different, and reflect different and independent attributes that set it apart from their other castle design...there is a apparently a rich history there that could be even further explored in this article, if a user is so inclined.

As this structure has a history, design, and intended impact, intentionally made separate from the original structure covered in the first article, I believe it should continue to be a separate article of it's own and hope it will be further fleshed out with historical information and insight into how the structure was conceived, differentiated, and built.

This breaks connectivity with the French article, which lists all three real world locations. As a result, I would be in favour of the English article also featuring all three real world locations. --LABcrabs (talk) 00:31, 15 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Sleeping Beauty Castle, Disneyland Paris, France.jpg Nominated for Deletion

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An image used in this article, File:Sleeping Beauty Castle, Disneyland Paris, France.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:11, 27 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Le Château de la Belle au Bois Dormant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:44, 19 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic