Talk:Le Déjeuner en fourrure

"Object", title and subtitle

"Object" is not the museum's classification of its type; that is its actual title, and its classification is clearly marked to be sculpture. This is I believe intended as a testament to the exalted role of "the object" in surrealist theory. "Le Déjeuner en fourrure" is the more distinctive and convenient subtitle. (Of course, substituting "Objet" with "Object" is a slight barbarism, but this appears to be common usage in English.)--Pharos (talk) 19:04, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

This article itself explains the origin of the title: "She originally titled it prosaically as "Cup, saucer and spoon covered with fur", but the work was renamed by Breton in reference to Manet's painting "Le Déjeuner sur l'herbe", i.e. not "Objet" with a subtitle.

The book this article references, Surrealism, by Cathrin Klingsöhr-Leroy and Uta Grosenick, gives the title of the work as "Fur Breakfast", not "Object".

French Wikipédia says of it in the Méret Oppenheim article: "En 1936, elle réalise, pour l'exposition surréaliste, l'objet « Le Déjeuner en fourrure » : une tasse, sa soucoupe et une petite cuillère recouvertes de fourrure", with the word "objet" outside the quotes because it's the designation, not part of the title.

France was the home of Surrealism, the work was conceived in a French café and realised in France, and all the university references turned up by a search on Google.fr refer to it as "Le Déjeuner en fourrure". The vast majority of references to "Object/Objet: Le Déjeuner en fourrure" are English, i.e. second-hand sources.

Objet/Object is clearly not the title nor even part of it.

Awien (talk) 22:56, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Im a few years late on this,

but I don't get it. Its obvious that the original artist, Oppenheim, clearly had a name that she had given to the piece to be used for the exhibition, yet we still use the renamed version by Breton? I believe this article should be renamed to Object/The Object, and leave the renamed version as a small note.

From Khan Academy:

"When Object was finished, Oppenheim submitted it to Breton for an exhibition of Surrealist objects at the Charles Ratton Gallery in Paris in 1936.  However, while Oppenheim preferred a non-descriptive title, Breton took the liberty of titling the piece Le Déjeneur en fourrure, or Luncheon in Fur".

I also believe that the french source that you have given may have lost context through translation. I do not believe that they would have referred to the artpiece as "the object". I believe that they would have likely said "pièce d'art" instead of "le objet". Also, sources that are in a different language than from the origins of the piece still counts as a primary source, just not in the same language. 207.144.70.67 (talk) 13:47, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Le Déjeuner en fourrure. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120406202029/http://collectionsonline.lacma.org/mwebcgi/mweb.exe?request=record&id=114280&type=101 to http://collectionsonline.lacma.org/mwebcgi/mweb.exe?request=record&id=114280&type=101

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:25, 19 December 2017 (UTC)