Talk:Le Studio

Untitled

There were many more albums produced at the Studio. I remember hearing that Queen, Bowie, Rolling Stones & Chicago had been there at various times.

Fair use rationale for Image:Interzonealbum.jpg

Image:Interzonealbum.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Mclachlan-fumbling.jpg

Image:Mclachlan-fumbling.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Mcgarrigle-matapedia.jpg

Image:Mcgarrigle-matapedia.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:47, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Coordinate error

{{geodata-check}}

Hello, I recently visted Le Studio on the 24th of February and discovered that the coordinates shown at the top-right of the "Le Studio" wikipedia page are close, but inaccurate. I used Google maps and found the correct coordinates, to be 45.876137 N and 74.269848 W, centered on the roof of the building.

Before my visit, I found the old coordinates on the page and went to that location. I was unhappy as I had not found the building. We left the site and decided to turn down a nearby road, and there it was, so those are the correct coordinates, if you wouldn't mind updating them so other people may find it easier than I did.

Thanks. —Nathan

 Fixed — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 15:25, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello, I have visited Le Studio in December 1st, 2018. And contrary of what was described here the studio was not completely destroyed. It still stands, although severely damaged. I know there are some Rush fanatics who want to deny that the studio is still there because they don't like the guy who is kind of living there and they want to discourage visitors who may support this guy. But facts are facts and the studio is still there, and I took a picture to prove it. For these disagreements of property or rights, we have the judiciary system! Not Wikipedia!

Thanks, —Marcelo

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Le Studio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071008103831/http://www.naimontreal.ca/PropDocs/domainemorinheights.pdf to http://www.naimontreal.ca/PropDocs/domainemorinheights.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:32, 19 December 2017 (UTC)