Talk:Leadcore Technology

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Leadcore Technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150127062717/http://www.leadcoretech.com/LC1810-A9.htm to http://www.leadcoretech.com/LC1810-A9.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150126092601/http://www.leadcoretech.com/LC1811-A9.htm to http://www.leadcoretech.com/LC1811-A9.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140819083926/http://www.leadcoretech.com/LC1813-Chip.htm to http://www.leadcoretech.com/LC1813-Chip.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140819085442/http://www.leadcoretech.com/LC1913-Chip.htm to http://www.leadcoretech.com/LC1913-Chip.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Object to deletion

I find the article, especially the product list table, reasonably informative and well-referenced. While these products may not be very popular, they are related to many later developments. The article also avoids personal opinions or speculation. I suggest keeping the article and adding a label for further improvement. wwwEagle (talk) 03:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Most of the references are to the company website so they fail WP:ORGIND.

From the non-company website sources, coverage on the company itself is minimal so fails WP:CORPDEPTH

Refer to WP:SIRS.

- Imcdc Contact 07:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Right. I've go through the WP:COMPANY page and it is really complicated for someone who's not contributing recently. Just need a quick opinion, is a reference such as "https://www.cnx-software.com/2013/08/03/leadcore-introduces-lc1810-lc1811-lc1813-and-lc1913-socs-for-smartphones-and-tablets/" acceptable as a additional source to the article? wwwEagle (talk) 06:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)