This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eastern Europe, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Eastern EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern EuropeTemplate:WikiProject Eastern EuropeEastern Europe articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This page appears lifted from grade 12 history notes - while the German page isn't the best in the world, are there any objections to a translation of it?
-AD, Heidelberg, May '06
Yes, the three emperors is completely wrong.
It's not Kaiser Wilhelm II but the I
Tt's Francis Joseph.
And finally it's not Alexander the III but the II.
cheers
/Hari5
Furthermore, Russia did not secretly rejoin the league of Three Emperors. Rather, they secretly signed the Reinsurance Treaty with Germany that, going against the Dual Alliance of 1879, says Germany and Russia will remain neutral if one of them is attacked by another country except in the case of Germany attacking France or Russia attacking Austria. Then the individual country could decide what to do.--D'Artagan (talk) 01:06, 5 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
In terms of content, the revised entry looks great; I only made a few minor modifications in terms of presentation and format.
To begin with, the reference section was originally untitled, so I reformatted it under a specific “Notes” heading. The “Diplomacy of the Great Powers 1871- 1913” reference box was awkwardly positioned between the text and the references for the text, so I moved it to the bottom of the page, which is generally where it is placed in entries with a similar type of category box. The “External Links” section was also slightly altered. Instead of providing the link at the very end of a given source, I turned the entire source itself into a link. This seemed to me to be general Wikipedia procedure as well (mostly because it gives you the fancy looking blue bullet box before each listed source).
.svg)
.svg)