Talk:Leah Vukmir
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Vukmir brags about being an ALEC member "in good standing" on her own website
edit"Vukmir Honored as "Legislator of the Year" by Peers at National Gathering" --Orange Mike | Talk 15:43, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Marijuana stance
editThis section should be deleted. This is entirely undue. While this issue ( medical marijuana) may be of importance to some editors, it isn't in the top 100 things that Vukmir is known for. Really? We are going to take this issue and insert it? Not leadership on Act 10 that inspired 100,000 protestors, not concealed carry, not defending smoking and tobacco in public places, not Badger Care? None of these get any attention, just marijuana. This is the very definition of WP:UNDUE.Capitalismojo (talk) 03:00, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- This isn't undue at all and shouldn't be whitewashed from the article. This isn't as much about her stance on medical marijuana as the fact that she accused her fellow legislators of having a secret agenda to legalize. The incident was covered in reliable news sources and the two sentences that were added do not comprise undue weight. If you think it would bring more balance to the article, I would support including Vukmir's positions on issues as well; those that you listed as well as TABOR. Gobōnobo + c 09:51, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- I concur. Even in the current poisonous Wisconsin political atmosphere, the bold accusations against her colleagues are noteworthy enough to justify a couple of sentences. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:56, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- Well, I think it's a goofy addition. The legies were accusing each other of all sorts of things last year ( and this year). Oh, well...if OrangeMike thinks it's of value I will concur.Capitalismojo (talk) 16:17, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- I concur. Even in the current poisonous Wisconsin political atmosphere, the bold accusations against her colleagues are noteworthy enough to justify a couple of sentences. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:56, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Leah Vukmir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120907224440/http://www.leahvukmir.com/About_Leah.aspx to http://www.leahvukmir.com/About_Leah.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718071858/http://www.wisn.com/r/25616834/detail.html to http://www.wisn.com/r/25616834/detail.html
- Added archive https://archive.is/20121214090932/http://legis.wisconsin.gov/senate/sen05/ to http://legis.wisconsin.gov/senate/sen05/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:00, 19 December 2017 (UTC)