Talk:Leak 04-13 (Bait Ones)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Joeyquism (talk · contribs) 01:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Heartfox (talk · contribs) 07:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

• "as "a catastrophe" → quotes in lead require inline citation per WP:LEADCITE
  • Reworded, as I don't enjoy having to include citations in the lead.
• "was almost immediately felt" → informal
  • Rephrased to "'BTSTU' also had an impact on contemporary pop music" - if a different phrasing is better here let me know
• "noted", "however" → WP:WTW
  • Removed "noted", though I'm not sure of which "however" you're referring to here
• "Some publications refrained from reviewing the 2013 bootleg" , " but critics who did choose to make note of it offered mostly positive opinions" → only one publication is cited to support each of these statements, but they are written as plural?
  • You're right. I've removed this sentence altogether.
• many of the genres stated in infobox are not supported in body
  • Changed to just pop, R&B and electronic
• Stephen ref missing magazine name
  • Fixed.
• Can you get a timestamp for the Masa interview?
  • Unfortunately, I think the only audible proof that this quote is even legitimate comes from this clip on Soundcloud. I couldn't find any archives of Zane Lowe's interviews anywhere.
• Not sure where DeVille supports that the album was released by XL
  • Added the Pitchfork review to supplement this.

Heartfox (talk) 07:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the review, Heartfox! This is one of the earlier works that I've done, and I'm realizing that it's in a bit of a shoddier state than I'd hoped. Looking forward to your further comments. joeyquism (talk) 13:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi Heartfox, is there more to come on this? joeyquism (talk) 16:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

How do the genres in the infobox meet WP:EXPLICITGENRE? Heartfox (talk) 00:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Pitchfork labels the album as pop and R&B in their review of the album here. I've since removed the electronic label as there aren't any direct mentions of an electronic label that I can find. I apologize for these errors. joeyquism (talk) 07:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

@Joeyquism: Thanks, passed. If you are able to leave comments at my current FAC that would be great! Best, Heartfox (talk) 19:56, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, Heartfox. I very much appreciate your consideration, but unfortunately I cannot promise a review at this time as I am planning to take an extended wikibreak after completing my own FAC and have tried to cut back on my contributions in the meantime. While I may eventually have the opportunity to review your nomination, I cannot make any guarantees at this moment. I hope you understand, and I wish you the best with your nomination. joeyquism (talk) 21:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)