Talk:Lechwe

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Angola / Botswana / DRC / Namibia / Zambia Mid‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Angola (assessed as Low-importance).
	Botswana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Botswana (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Democratic Republic of the Congo portal This article is supported by WikiProject Democratic Republic of the Congo.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Namibia.
	Zambia portal This article is supported by WikiProject Zambia.

Image: Black Lechwe

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Does anyone have a photo of Black Lechwe that could be used on this page?
—GRM 20:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

We have added two black lechwe photos to the gallery. We don't have a close up of an individual, which would be a good addition. Mehmet Karatay 16:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Range

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The comment "A single animal may have been recorded in... Australia..." seems more like trivia than useful content. Clearly that individual was introduced, and a single animal nine years ago does not even hint at an established population. I think that line should be deleted, but as a layperson, I don't think I should be the one to do it. Raran75 (talk) 04:41, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic