Talk:Leconotide

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Leconotide.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

It is requested that an image or photograph of Leconotide be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Any clinical trials

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is it being tested clinically ? - Rod57 (talk) 04:15, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Structure mistake

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed SMILES, InChI, systematic name, and formula/weight because they all had this as a linear structure and both book refs #1 and #2 and also doi:10.1023/B:MODI.0000025656.79632.86 journal ref I found say it's polycyclic with multiple cystine bridges. They also had the atypical (and unlikely for this context) tautomeric form of amide bonds. The entries I removed were what PubChem and ChemSpider say, so it's a great warning about how we can't blindly trust them: mechanically generating one representation from another fails if the underlying source is wrong or incomplete. DMacks (talk) 19:22, 15 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic