Talk:Lectures on the Philosophy of History
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I removed the redirect on this page and added what you see because there was a link on the Hegel page to this page, creating a self-redirect. Rather than removing the link altogether (which seemed like a bad idea because it might discourage people from actually writing about the Lectures), I decided to create a stub. I know the article is ugly now, so if anyone has other ideas, please don't hesitate. Or, better yet, write a real article! --Anakolouthon 18:16, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
it's the "philosophy of history" not "history of philosophy" - this is probably why no one has written anything. please change title of article.
Cleanup
editI started. The lectures are commonly used as intro to Hegel's philosophy, so something needed to be written, though it's not a lot by any means. Also, the state of the text needed to be addressed, so people can actually know what they are holding when they have a copy of the lectures. They aren't all uniform, and there is still no full English trans. of the complete German lectures. Have fun with the article, I've done all I want to do for a while. Morgaledh (talk) 07:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Critical Editions -- incorrect information in article
editWalter Jaeschke's edition has generally superseded the (highly problematic, almost useless) Lasson edition, and that's what you find at Meiner Verlag today. Moreover, the 1840 2nd edition which is the basis for Suhrkamp's edition was put together by Bruno Bauer, not by Hegel's son. Austinmgross 08:27, 13 February 2018 (UTC)