Talk:Lee Jeong-hyang
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Snowydaze. Peer reviewers: KS531.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
FMST329: Peer review
editHi Snowydaze!
Love your article, it's a great start! I have nothing much to say except maybe some minor suggestions:
- An infobox with her general information gathered into one place.
- If possible, more information about her personal life in order for the reader to get a sense of who she is (as a person and writer).
- 'life and career' as two distinct sections (ex. 'career' and 'personal life')
- Her general achievements and/or works, in the introduction
Little correction: *Born in South Korea
Aside from that, love your writing and wording. Thank you for the good read and good luck with your assignment!
Peer Review 2
editI enjoyed this article very much, I like how concise you are. There is a little grammatical error when you say "Born in South Korean". I'd also like a little more contextual information about the government censorship that afflicted Lee. Beyond that, I think some citations for the claim that her second film is "undoubtedly her most successful and critically acclaimed to date." But I really enjoyed this article and think it was really well done.