Talk:Lee Seung-yeon

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. Cúchullain ^t/c 19:12, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

---

Lee Seung-yeon → Lee Seung-yeon (actress born 1968) – another actress with same name Lee Seung-yeon (actress born 1977). Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 12:51, 20 August 2014 (UTC) Jjaey (talk) 09:18, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

• Comment: Support in principle, but I don't think the word "actress" is necessary in this case. In my opinion they should be renamed Lee Seung-yeon (born 1968) and Lee Seung-yeon (born 1977) respectively. Of course, by checking Korean Wikipedia I also see another Lee Seung-yeon born in 1977 who is a TV broadcaster, but before that person gets an English wiki page I don't find the word "actress" necessary. Timmyshin (talk) 17:41, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Or at least, this page can just be at "(born 1968)" —innotata 21:16, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose. This Seung-yeon gets twice the page views of the younger one.[1][2] The younger one has been in a long list of films. Several of these were popular, but she is a very minor character in those. The Satanic Sheik (talk) 09:53, 13 August 2014 (UTC) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kauffner

• "Twice as many hits" to me just means they have comparable popularity; especially since neither article averages more than 50 views per day (very few). Any topic occupying the primary page is bound to receive more traffic than another with a disambiguated title, that's just technicality, reverse the 2 people and you'd have the same situation. Certainly the older actress has more credits, and I don't disagree that she's more notable, but at this stage I don't think she's primary. Timmyshin (talk) 07:47, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Sawol (talk) 11:20, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
• Support None of these people clearly is the primary topic, as pointed out by Timmyshin. —innotata 21:16, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
• Comment: As of now, each time I searched for Lee Seung-yeon, the older Lee will get the page view and has advantage over the younger Lee. To be fair, both should have equal chance.--Jjaey (talk) 09:25, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
• An article is primary if it gets more than 50 percent of the page views. If there are only two articles to consider, one or the other must be primary. King of all fruit (talk) 10:07, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

• First time I heard that policy. Are you suggesting that all disambiguation pages with only 2 articles should be obliterated? Timmyshin (talk) 00:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

*"A topic is primary for a term, with respect to usage, if it is highly likely—much more likely than any other topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined," per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. This is the basic the rule concerning primary topics. See also WP:TWODABS. King of all fruit (talk) 01:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kauffner

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lee Seung-yeon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131102113537/http://www.tenasia.com/archives/74932 to http://www.tenasia.com/archives/74932

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:36, 13 May 2017 (UTC)