Talk:Legal English

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Writing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Writing, a WikiProject interested in improving Wikipedia's coverage of content related to the fields of rhetoric, composition, technical communication, literacy, and language studies.WritingWikipedia:WikiProject WritingTemplate:WikiProject WritingWriting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

English Language Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Language, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the English language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.English LanguageWikipedia:WikiProject English LanguageTemplate:WikiProject English LanguageEnglish Language articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dialect

The "Definition" and the entire article, really, is focused heavily on British English. Much of what is said would have to be changed to apply accurately to American legal English. Perhaps mention that as the last sentence of the Definition section.

Capitalization

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It would be worth mentioning the Unusual Capitalization Practices as well. -- Beland (talk) 07:21, 21 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

legal awareness

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You are well come to contribute and improve article legal awareness.

Mahitgar (talk) 12:34, 31 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Formally?

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm sceptical about the final sentence of the introduction, saying that legal English is "formally referred to as lawspeak or legalese". Isn't it formally referred to as "legal English" but colloquially as "lawspeak" or "legalese"? I have a hard time picturing a formal document such as, well, a legal contract or an Act of Parliament making casual reference to "lawspeak". Binabik80 (talk) 20:31, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

"intuitive execution, complete meaning and open upgrade"

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The introductory paragraph of this article uses a bunch of terms that are very far from self-explanatory (and don't link to anything particularly useful for interpreting them elsewhere in Wikipedia). I don't have access to any of the references cited in the paragraph (which appear to all be books), so I have no idea if these are bits of extremely obscure linguistic jargon (so obscure that it can't be found by Google searches, except on copies of this page), or if they are just nonsense that doesn't mean anything at all. I'd like to dramatically rewrite the introduction to be clearer, but without access to any of the references, I'm not sure I can do it justice. BlckKnght (talk) 01:51, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic