Talk:Legend (1994 video game)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Vandalism
editIs there a reason for changing the main villains name in the main article? It seems like minor vandalism.
Merger proposal
editFeel free to comment at Talk:Legend (disambiguation)#Merger proposal.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:42, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Questionable sourcing
editArticle seems to use a lot of sites that look questionable. Remember, WP is not about what is true, rather what is sourced by third party RS. So if a RS doesn't comment on it, it's not included in pages, even if its true.
- youtube
It cites youtube videos. The problem is that these are WP:Selfpublished and possible copyright violations. The problem is that someone could forge a video and then use that to get info on Wikipedia. We need third party sourcing.
- retrogamingmagazine
Looks like yet another fan site/blog thing of many countless thousands.
- gameblog.fr
Looks like a blog.
- cyberroach.com
Never heard of them.
- gdri.smspower.org
Fan project.
- unseen64.net
Fan site.
There's probably a few others. Harizotoh9 (talk) 06:15, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Aha, and they sometimes do a better job at unveiling unknown material and stuff about well known and obscure titles than mainstream media. Unseen64 has been recognized by various outlets and some of the other websites have been mentioned as well in other parts. I do what I think its right. I do not have to follow the rules established at Wikipedia to the teeth. Also, stop forcing your viewpoints to the articles in regards as to what's reliable or not...Roberth Martinez (talk) 03:03, 13 August 2019 (UTC)