Talk:Legends Cup (LFL)

Comment

I updated for 2007. Seemed dated to 2005. --Editingfiend 22:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

External links section

I added some links to the 'External links section' which I mainly added because of the many images that were shown there (which I think add visual aid about that theme). Two of these links link lead to Italian webpages. JHunterJ deleted these links because he probably thought/thinks they are adding only minor value to the article. After writing to JHunterJ he didn't disapprove that I add them again to the 'External links section' of the article to see if any other editor objects... (That's what he wrote: I think "neutral and accurate material" refers to external articles, but perhaps it could pertain to picture collections.)

What do you think? -- Weapon X (de) 21:40, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Style Guides about links:

Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links)

...

Foreign-language sites

Since this is the English Wikipedia, webpages in English are highly preferred. Linking to non-English pages may still be useful for English-language readers in some cases:

• when linking to pages with maps, diagrams, photos, tables; explain the key terms with the link, so that people who do not know the language can still interpret them

...

Wikipedia:External links

...

What should be linked to

...

5. Sites that contain neutral and accurate material not already in the article. Ideally this content should be integrated into the Wikipedia article, then the link would remain as a reference, but in some cases this is not possible for copyright reasons or because the site has a level of detail which is inappropriate for the Wikipedia article.

6. Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as textbooks or reviews.

...

Fair use rationale for Image:Teams @ LB I.jpg

Image:Teams @ LB I.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:16, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Teams @ LB II.jpg

Image:Teams @ LB II.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:16, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Cricism

The article mentions that Lingerie Bowl was controversial and faced criticism, but does not mention what it was. I'm curious :). --CyHawk (talk) 16:21, 22 January 2008 (UTC)