Talk:Legends of Bikini Bottom

Legends of Bikini Bottom was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 19, 2014). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 October 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Television: Episode coverage / Nickelodeon Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Nickelodeon task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Animation: American / Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Legends of Bikini Bottom/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ChrisGualtieri (talk · contribs) 05:48, 2 January 2014 (UTC) I'll do this one. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:48, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Good Article Checklist

Well-written -the prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; and it contains no original research.
Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each.
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
Illustrated, if possible, by images: images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )

3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Disambig links:OK
External links:OK
Reference check: OK

Comments: This article has a major problem, it doesn't tell the reader anything about the episodes or the shared viewpoint that is covered in the definition of an "anthology series". I expect a detailed analysis of the five episodes and their viewpoints and differences. I also expect that it would include more on the production and writing. Currently, it reads mostly on the facts of the number of viewers, the air date and the guest stars with no coverage on the episodes themselves. Nancy Basile's comments only make the reader more interested in this missing content, the page just doesn't properly serve the reader to explain the basic context. As someone who has not watched or seen the program, this article has left me very confused and unfulfilled about what is even being discussed. Articles are supposed to be stand alone and have enough context to fill the reader in. I am not asking for a character breakdown or anything over the top, but just an article that approaches it from the angle of no familiarity with the work itself. I see a lot of references to Lost, but I really can't review this properly without some actual context of what it is to go on. Please notify me when you can address these issues. I will place it on hold for a week. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:08, 3 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

There has been no updates to this since the review and I think the amount of work with the other reviews means that I should fail this rather than continue to hold it indefinitely. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:28, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I have to fail this. There has been no work for over two weeks and its been a least a week since my last comment. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:44, 19 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Legends of Bikini Bottom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:14, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Legends of Bikini Bottom

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Legends of Bikini Bottom's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Plot":

From Best Day Ever: SpongeBob SquarePants: Season Four, Volume 2. DVD. Paramount Home Entertainment, 2007.
From Dunces and Dragons: SpongeBob SquarePants: Lost in Time. DVD. Paramount Home Entertainment, 2006.
From The Sponge Who Could Fly: SpongeBob SquarePants: The Complete 3rd Season. DVD. Paramount Home Entertainment, 2005.
From Pest of the West: SpongeBob SquarePants: Season 5, Vol. 2. DVD. Paramount Home Entertainment. 2008.
From The Great Patty Caper: SpongeBob SquarePants: The Complete 7th Season. DVD. Paramount Home Entertainment, 2011.
From SpongeBob SquarePants (season 1): SpongeBob SquarePants: 10 Happiest Moments. DVD. Paramount Home Entertainment, 2010.
From Square Roots: The Story of SpongeBob SquarePants: Beck, Jerry (July 7, 2009). "SpongeBob documentary". Cartoon Brew. Retrieved May 19, 2013.
From Have You Seen This Snail?: SpongeBob SquarePants: Season Four, Volume 1. DVD. Paramount Home Entertainment, 2006.
From Christmas Who?: SpongeBob SquarePants: The Complete 2nd Season. DVD. Paramount Home Entertainment, 2004.
From Friend or Foe (SpongeBob SquarePants): SpongeBob SquarePants: Season 5, Vol. 1. DVD. Paramount Home Entertainment. 2007.
From Pizza Delivery (SpongeBob SquarePants): SpongeBob SquarePants: The Complete 1st Season. DVD. Paramount Home Entertainment, 2003.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:52, 9 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic