Talk:Leges Henrici Primi
 | Leges Henrici Primi has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 23, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Leges Henrici Primi (written c. 1115) sets out a list of royal pleas or pleas of the crown, crimes that could only be tried in front of the king or his officials? | |||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Leges Henrici Primi be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Notes
edit- "...the author of the two works had been a member of Gerard" I can't parse this to fix it. --Wetman (talk) 04:14, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
GA review
editThe review can be found at this link. BencherliteTalk 15:24, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Leges Henrici Primi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121020154951/http://www.bl.uk/catalogues/manuscripts/HITS0001.ASP?VPath=html%2F37850.htm&Search=313&Highlight=F to http://www.bl.uk/catalogues/manuscripts/HITS0001.ASP?VPath=html%2F37850.htm&Search=313&Highlight=F
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121020154951/http://www.bl.uk/catalogues/manuscripts/HITS0001.ASP?VPath=html%2F37850.htm&Search=313&Highlight=F to http://www.bl.uk/catalogues/manuscripts/HITS0001.ASP?VPath=html%2F37850.htm&Search=313&Highlight=F
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:34, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Use by SCOTUS in Dobbs to insert religion into US Government
editPage 17 of the Dobbs slip opinion, in footnote 25:
"Even before Bracton's time, English law imposed punishment for the killing of a fetus. See Leges Henrici Primi 222–223 (L. Downer ed. 1972) (imposing penalty for any abortion and treating a woman who aborted a "quick" child "as if she were a murderess")."
Justice Alito and the others knowingly (see other opinions by Alito showing this) omitted the fact the "punishment" for abortion was seven years of religious pennance, although it was not a crime [1]https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/21/21-476/225968/20220521104545031_21-476_ac_DavidBoyle.pdf. 173.14.7.129 (talk) 15:09, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- This is basically trivia. There are likely to be plenty of mentions of this set of laws in various legal codes/legal treatises/etc ... we don't need to mention every one of them. Ealdgyth (talk) 15:29, 13 October 2022 (UTC)