Talk:Legion of Super-Heroes (1958 team)

Image copyright problem with File:The1stLegion.JPG

The image File:The1stLegion.JPG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --18:25, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

There. Are you satisfied, bot? Go bother some other article. Nutiketaiel (talk) 20:34, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

"Differences" section

We really shouldn't say that the various revelations about the Johns-era Legion are "not consistent with the Legion of Super-Heroes' history" unless some reliable source has drawn that conclusion. It would be better to note new ideas (such as Dream Girl's powers deriving from the Dreaming) and apparent inconsistencies (such as Karate Kid's resurrection) more neutrally. I'm not enough of a Legion expert to know the best way to phrase this, but I'm sure that "not consistent" is too loaded. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 03:23, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

I concur. I think the term retcon (retroactive continuity) is the appropriate neutral term to identify 'inconsistencies' like those identified above. As another example, it is my understanding that the three Legions have been 'retconned' to be from Earth-0, Earth 247, and Earth Prime respectively.Kbloodworth (talk) 13:30, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Is "Earth-0" what they're calling "New Earth," or what used to be "Earth-1," nowadays? In any case, I agree that "retcon" is the most appropriate term to use. Nutiketaiel (talk) 16:47, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Legion of Super-Heroes (1958 team). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090221183229/http://www.legiononline.net/ to http://www.legiononline.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:59, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

"Creative Team" in infobox

I'm curious why the infobox entries under "Creative Team" all begin with v.2. Many of the most famous writers and pencillers (Bridwell, Bates, Swan, Shooter, etc.) aren't shown because of this. Is there a reason behind this decision? · rodii · 17:36, 27 October 2018 (UTC)