Talk:Legitimacy of the State of Israel/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Title must be changed
The current title is not correct, "Legitimacy of the State of Israel" is the correct title.
Please fix ASAP Mikelieman (talk) 11:09, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
What should it be changed to? Tranman64 (talk) 22:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Rhetoric
Calling it Rhetoric seems a little biased to me? Also, pro-Israel claims are stated as fact, while anti-Israel claims are quoted.
Reference: "The answer is simple: They are trying to divert attention from the intensifying world opposition to the occupation of the West Bank and to the blockade of the Gaza Strip, both of which, by almost any standard, are illegitimate. They are trying to divert attention from the ever-expanding settlements, which are not only illegitimate but illegal under international law. They are trying to divert attention from the ever-louder calls for Israel to grant Palestinians equal rights."
Wiki page: "M.J. Rosenberg, writing in the Los Angeles Times, argued that the term "delegitimization" is a "distraction", whose purpose is to divert attention away from world opposition to the "illegitimate" occupation of the West Bank and blockade of the Gaza Strip, from the "illegal" settlements, and from "the ever-louder calls for Israel to grant Palestinians equal rights"."
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Legitimacy of Israel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070912101430/http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/1ce874ab1832a53e852570bb006dfaf6/0b3ab8d2a7c0273d8525694b00726d1b to http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/1ce874ab1832a53e852570bb006dfaf6/0b3ab8d2a7c0273d8525694b00726d1b
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:45, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Re: Rhetoric of Delegitimization
The subsection "Legitimacy rhetoric as distraction" seems to be entirely devoted to one person's opinion. Shouldn't this be an issue? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A000:121A:C07E:A5AE:475F:8EE5:B955 (talk) 23:18, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Failure to mention Indigenousness
At the beginning of the article, it implies that the Jewish claim to self-determination in Israel is purely a religious one. See:
"According to Bible, the children of Israel as biological descendants of the Patriarchs (Abraham, Isaac, Jacob) are the legitimate and rightful owners of "Land of Canaan" or "Promised Land" because God only promised to give the land for the merits of the fathers."
In actuality, the Jewish claim to Israel is one of indigenousness, the Jews are indigenous to Israel as has been established by genetic and historical evidence. I ask that any editor with the ability to do so adds a paragraph that explains this, rather than allowing this article to contribute to misinformation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.184.39.16 (talk) 15:13, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have removed the paragraph instead, which was inserted in March 2020 by an editor who has been blocked for making mass changes without consensus. Seloloving (talk) 16:19, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Countries' recognition
The list of countries recognizing Israel should be updated following agreements with Bahrain, Sudan, Morocco and Bhutan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:ED0:5F4C:2800:5046:2CDE:AC44:C21A (talk) 11:55, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Worst Wikipedia Article I Know
This is truly an awful article, the fact that Israel’s legitimacy is subject to debate because of recognition, by that means why isn’t North Korea or South Korea on the list, or Kosovo and Taiwan and China, the fact to single out one state, Israel on its legitimacy is a disgrace as other countries are not subject to the same treatment on this site regardless of their recognition. Salandarianflag (talk) 19:28, 24 July 2023 (UTC)