Talk:Lego The Angry Birds Movie

Lego Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lego on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LegoWikipedia:WikiProject LegoTemplate:WikiProject LegoLego articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Proposed deletion of page

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I would like to offer an opinion about the deletion of this page. With regards to the comment "Redundent page for a LEGO theme that lasted less then a year and had very few kits" - I agree that this article needs a lot of work but a lack of content does not in itself imply lack of notability. I believe that there is "significant coverage" of the topic per WP:GNG. The Lego theme is a franchise that is a separate entity to the general Angry Birds franchise. As a Lego theme it is no less notable than for example Lego Jurassic World (theme). It has also received media coverage in terms of its six sets and web shorts. Perhaps it can be expanded with additional sources. Striker2020 (talk) 14:05, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

According to WP:PROD I may remove the tag if I disagree, so I will go ahead with this. Striker2020 (talk) 14:07, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Abandoned user draft

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Are individual set citations from Brickset worth adding? That's all that could be merged from the earlier draft at User:Oon835/sandbox 9. Please would an interested editor merge them if worthwhile into the live article, blank the user page as WP:COPYARTICLE, and leave a note here when done? – Fayenatic London 11:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic