This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I removed a category here [1] as MPS is not mentioned in the article. The removal was reverted here: [2]. I note that WP:CAT says "Categorization of articles must be verifiable. It should be clear from verifiable information in the article why it was placed in each of its categories. [Emphasis added.]" With this editing guideline in mind, restoration of the category is improper. – S. Rich (talk) 03:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
Please see my edit summary. It's easy to find a source, if this bothers you. Please do so rather than delete. Personally, it doesn't bother me. It's widely known and not controversial and some editor will find the source if you choose not to. SPECIFICOtalk03:31, 22 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
I saw your edit summary. The guidance cited above says verification is needed. And WP:V is one of WP core content policies. Also this is a BLP. Some other editor is more than welcome to provide sourcing since you choose not to do so even though it is "widely known" and "easy to find a source". – S. Rich (talk) 03:51, 22 November 2013 (UTC)Reply
