Talk:Lemon drop (cocktail)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lemon drop (cocktail) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Lemon drop (cocktail) has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 2, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Lemon drop (cocktail) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 December 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Lemon Drop/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 06:45, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
GA criteria
editPost followup to "Comments", the article also fully complies with grammatical policies, as well as those for layout/structure. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 20:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
- (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
Post followup to the suggestions in "Comments", below, the article fully checks out in terms of its use of reliable references, and application of citations. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 20:29, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
- (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
- (c) it contains no original research
Looks like the article covers all encyclopedically relevant aspects of the subject. Nothing trivial or crufty. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 03:53, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
- (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
There's nothing in the tone of the article to suggest any sort of bias concerning the topic. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 03:51, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
In all near-four years of the article's existence, it has never been subjected to disruptive editing. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 03:43, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
All images used in the article serve an informative-illustrative purpose, and all use appropriate licensing. On a side-note, these are some very attractive photographs. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 03:41, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
- (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
Comments
edit- "Superfine sugar [...], which is more finely ground compared to standard granulated sugar, is sometimes used to sugar the rim of the glass." Since this sentence immediately follows one which directly refers to the process of sugaring the rim of the glass, wouldn't it be simpler to say, "Superfine sugar [...], which is more finely ground compared to standard granulated sugar, is sometimes used for this purpose"?
- Done I agree with simplifying the sentence in the manner, which has been performed in the article (diff). North America1000 15:57, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- "The Lemon Drop was invented by Norman Jay Hobday, the founder and proprietor of Henry Africa's [...]. The drink was invented sometime in the 1970s by Hobday at Henry Africa's, and was originally served in a cocktail glass." Rather than repeating names and locations, I might recommend rewording this as "The Lemon Drop was invented by Norman Jay Hobday, the founder and proprietor of Henry Africa's [...]. He invented the drink sometime in the 1970s, originally serving it at Henry Africa's in a cocktail glass."
- Done I have reworded the content as suggested above, but not verbatim. See diff. North America1000 16:02, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- On that line in the second paragraph of "Overview"; "Additional ingredients may also be used in the drink's preparation."... Is it possible for one of the sources in the article's list of references to be directly cited after this line? I looked through the citations in the immediately surrounding sentences, but I didn't notice any direct mentioning of this. While I'm sure the statement is true, I'd just feel better about verifying the article's compliance with references-related criteria if this were cited. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 04:20, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Done See diff. North America1000 16:05, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Excellent, on all three counts! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 20:27, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- Done See diff. North America1000 16:05, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
The article now checks out. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 20:31, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Lemon Drop (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 12:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Lemon drop (candy) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:01, 13 April 2020 (UTC)