Talk:Lemon law/Archive 1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by 75.147.48.65 in topic extension of article or new article
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Lemon law. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Discrepancy
Somebody notice this, do something about it, and feel free to delete this comment when you are done.
- The entry for 'lemon law' states, "If you knowingly purchase a car in "as is" condition the buyer does not void their rights under applicable lemon laws." in the section labeled 'as is'.
- The entry for 'the market for lemons' states, "Purchasers who knowingly purchase a car in "as is" condition accept the defects and void their rights under the "lemon law"" at the end of the section labeled 'laws in the u.s.'
these clearly do not jibe.
i will post this exact comment on the discussion page for the other entry i mentioned.Carnydog (talk) 02:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
extension of article or new article
the car is a major appliance * after a while most states enacted lemon laws that applied to household appliances ie washers driers furnaces * this was as important as the original laws because * as most of these laws state * the expense of these articles is an appreciable portion of a middle and low income and the are non*luxury items basic to day to day living * 75.147.48.65 (talk) 18:53, 3 October 2012 (UTC)grumpy