Talk:Leonard Arthur

Comments

I have removed the deletion tag for the reasons stated in the article intro. It was an important case for the medical profession and the legal system in Britain. Malick78 (talk) 15:25, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

The case is perhaps notable, not the person. This should be renamed and edited to focus in the case not the individual (see WP:BLP1E). Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:52, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Whatever. How about we wait a while and let others add things? Just cos I can't google his achievements (perhaps mentioned in a subscription website...) doesn't mean there's nothing about him to say. There's no hurry here (and hey, you were a bit hasty putting the tag on within an hour of the page's inception). Furthermore, an article about a guy accused of murder (rather than the case), has quite a lot of precedents on WP. There's even a category for it;) Malick78 (talk) 16:09, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leonard Arthur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080419084944/http://www.catholicdoctors.org.uk/CMQ/Nov_1999/culture_of_death_g_wright.htm to http://www.catholicdoctors.org.uk/CMQ/Nov_1999/culture_of_death_g_wright.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:03, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

edit for move to R v Arthur

There's a lot of good information in here, but I think the page needs to be about R v Arthur and not Arthur himself. (I am much more confident in the fact that an R v Arthur page should exist than I am in the fact that this one should not). Thoughts? I'm still quite new and a bit nervous to make big moves like this without discussion, so I wanted to throw it out to you guys. If she wants to dance and drink all night, well, there's no one here to stop her. (talk) 05:39, 29 February 2020 (UTC)