Talk:Leonard Susskind

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 2A02:587:411D:B900:3058:F96E:4CB3:C46C in topic Translations

Questionable Source

edit

Hi, I don't know the appropriate syntax for noting this directly on the page, but the URL used citation #24 is not very reputable: http://www.rinf.com/news/dec05/string.html There also does not seem to be another source given in the page that can confirm the Murray Gell-Mann elevator episode.

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Leonard Susskind. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

"Leonardo Susskind"

edit

For now I've removed "Leonardo Susskind" referenced from around 6 minutes into [1] per WP:RS and a lack of corraboration; for all I know it may be true, but it also may be a weird in-joke, and I can't find any corraboration. If we find a cite where Susskind himself claims on the record that his birthname is "Leonardo", we should add it in. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 04:26, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Leonard Susskind has a response to the pointsized Universal future horizon, add it here

edit

Leonard Susskind claims that the visible Universe is a static sphere. That's wrong. Initially it grows (because more information reaches us) and finally it becomes infinite causally fragmented points and - we iff we were particles - we would be one point Universe causally disconnected (but Big Bang will be caused earlier than that point horizon due to a phase transition in the Higgs field).

Leonard Susskind has an answer to those who claim that the increasing acceleration of the universal expansion will cause the visible Universe to be a point. He has an answer. Add it please. It's absolutely important and crucial to what he's doing!
correction: (the increasing spatial acceleration always creates at last a "pointsized visible Universe" - Susskind has an analytical mechanism which avoids that fragmentation, because the Higgs field explodes before the point-sized causal disconnection

Translations

edit