Talk:Leopoldo O'Donnell

Untitled

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Proposed move of Leopoldo O'Donnell, Duke of Tetuan to Leopoldo O'Donnell, 1st Duke of Tetuan

The result of the debate was Move. —Wknight94 (talk) 01:10, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

• support request move in order to differentiate better between him and his heir Hugo O'Donnell, Duke of Tetuan. Also numerical order is used when listing nobles on Wikipedia. Gryffindor 16:33, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 20 August 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Page moved to Leopoldo O'Donnell. (non-admin closure) Vpab15 (talk) 08:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

---

• Leopoldo O'Donnell, 1st Duke of Tetuán → Leopoldo O'Donnell
• Ramón María Narváez, 1st Duke of Valencia → Ramón María Narváez

– These are some of those situations where the WP:OBE exceptions apply: Peers who are almost exclusively known by their personal names. English-language sources and contemporary Spanish-sources tend to refer to those under their names rather than under their nobiliary titles (which, should be noted, were awarded to them after becoming prime ministers and after having already become notable on their own right). Would be a similar case to Baldomero Espartero in that the titles were a reward for the actions that made them become widely-known, rather than the reason making these people notable. Impru20^talk 01:25, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

• Support. Srnec (talk) 15:15, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
• Support. Another case in which concision suggests dropping the nobiliary title. The most common way these men were addressed was probably by their surname and their military condition (General/Marshal). Nobiliary titles are secondary (something to mention somewhere rather than the way to refer to the subjects, particularly in recent historiography, not to say that the occasions when they are addressed inline by the nobiliary title in sources the numeral is never mentioned). PS: Besides the very common unneeded addition of the nobiliary title in many occasions (as in acting as if WP:CONCISE did not exist), I am becoming increasingly convinced that the use of numerals in the case of Spanish nobility for Wikipedia titles is pretty much always cruftesque and often also problematic from an accuracy standpoint.--Asqueladd (talk) 09:55, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

---

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Y Done. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:25, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

He was born at Santa Cruz de Tenerife in the Canary Islands, a son...?

Is this grammatically correct? At? Shouldn't be "He was born in Santa Cruz de Tenerife"? Akiraric (talk) 02:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)