This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
The contents of the Lepilaena page were merged into Althenia on 13 March 2021 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Larkum et al. is an authoritive reference on seagrasses. It is recent. I trust it more than FloraBase, although I would usually use only FloraBase for Australian species (it's easier). Of Lepilaena" "two species are truly marine (Womersley, 1984)" --69.226.103.13 (talk) 10:53, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Any better? The information for L. cylindrocarpa at FloraBase shows the herbarium's records of an inland distribution, summarising it as "marine" seemed misleading. I didn't change marina :-) BTW, Florabase is only good for species in the western third of the continent. cygnis insignis14:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it's better. I put the source for the marine inside the brackets because after reviewing some literature online I found most sources say the genus is not marine. I think that plus the additional text makes the article much more useful. Micropaleontologists are only interested in the western third of the continent. --69.226.103.13 (talk) 18:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
