 | Lepraria incana has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 11, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Lepraria incana/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: J Milburn (talk · contribs) 14:29, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
I think this is a really stellar article; I have basically nothing to add. (I think I have only said this once or twice before, meaning fewer than 1% of reviews!)
- I have made a few tiny edits. Please double-check them to make sure you're happy.
- If this was at FAC, I think I might press for a bit more clarity on the issue of distribution. I appreciate that this is far from an easy request, but at least there could be a bit more linkage between what is said in the article and what is said in the lead. (One of my changes related to this.)
- Again, if this was at FAC, I think I might push for a bit more about non-fungal partners.
Anyway, that's all I have to say right now. If you're happy with my edits, I'm happy to go ahead and promote the article. Josh Milburn (talk) 14:29, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thank-you for the copyedits, and things to think about in the future. I've pretty much tapped my sources about this species, but plan to create a few more articles about other Lepraria species, so I might find some additional tidbits to add to this one. Esculenta (talk) 05:39, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Great; I'm promoting now, then. I'll keep my eyes open for any future nominations, but I'm not around as much as I used to be, so I may miss it. Josh Milburn (talk) 19:19, 11 November 2021 (UTC)