Talk:Les Illusions de la Psychanalyse
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Totocugno in topic 2023
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 21 March 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Notability
editThe notability of this book has been questioned in an edit here. I submit that if there is a reliable source calling a book a classic (and in this case there is), the book ought to be considered notable. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 10:06, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your submission. Thing is, per WP:NBOOK, we have a higher standard. Specifically, the standard says that we need multiple sources to say the title is notable. Do those sources exist? If not, then it fails the notability guideline. To this end, I've nominated the article for deletion. -- Mikeblas (talk) 00:51, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- Ah, the biting sarcasm. I only try to be helpful. Did you even bother to look for sources before nominating the article for deletion, Mikeblas? FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 00:54, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- Nothing I posted here was sarcastic. -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:00, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, it's simply that I sometimes get a little crotchety when an article I started gets nominated for deletion. Apologies. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 06:35, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Nothing I posted here was sarcastic. -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:00, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Ah, the biting sarcasm. I only try to be helpful. Did you even bother to look for sources before nominating the article for deletion, Mikeblas? FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 00:54, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
2023
editUser:EvergreenFir , can you explain about this undo ? T0t0 Cugn0 (talk) 16:09, 20 July 2023 (UTC)