Talk:Lesbian erotica
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lesbian erotica article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Lesbian erotica:
|
Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
Requested move 18 May 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: consensus to move(closed by non-admin page mover) Kostas20142 (talk) 09:53, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Lesbianism in erotica → Lesbian erotica – Per WP:COMMONNAME. "Lesbianism" is a less common term than "lesbian". feminist (talk) 08:57, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support, being a lesbian in a man's body (sarcasm, have to clarify nowadays), I know it when I see it. Randy Kryn (talk) 16:04, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support Per WP:CONCISE.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 07:54, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support—No reason it should be construed as a subclass "in". Tony (talk) 08:21, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support, "Lesbian erotica" is far more common. Sam Sailor 14:37, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Support per COMMONNAME & PRECISE. –Davey2010Talk 14:26, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Belated comment on article title and bibliography
editI see that the article title was changed by consensus last year. I am the originator of the article and just wanted to comment on the choice of words in the original title. My thought was that "Lesbian erotica" implied erotica by and for lesbian women, whereas "Lesbianism in erotica" would be broader and would include depictions of lesbianism in erotica by lesbian women and also the broad genre where lesbianism is featured in erotica catering to heterosexual men. But really, the term "Lesbian erotica" could probably mean both and the change makes sense.
BTW, the choice of "erotica" was deliberate in that I wanted the article to be inclusive of historical art erotica and current pornography.
I will also point out that I probably went overboard on the bibliography section, placing it those references there as potential sources for the article's expansion. Iamcuriousblue (talk) 13:58, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Lesbian-for-pay in Adult Film Industry
editThe Majority of Pornographic Film Actresses in Mainstream Lesbian Pornography are straight and bisexual or pansexual respektively polysexual and this is the Major reason why Lesbian women critize Authenticity and Presentation of Mainstream Lesbian Pornography.--217.92.58.201 (talk) 14:22, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Can someone ban Queensfence?
editHe seems to find it funny to replace the top image of this article (which is supposed to be a painting) with graphic pornography. 72.197.180.224 (talk) 00:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)