This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
Hi, the heading "Its rejection by the Catholic Church" is, shall we say, sour grapes. "The Catholic Church" has never rejected the hymn but embraced it. Just because the USCCB put out a document to deprecate it doesn't mean it has been rejected in any way. The USCCB has no doctrinal authority. They do not actually need to approve any hymn for usage in the Mass or liturgy. The USCCB can't tell any bishop or pastor what to put in their hymnals, or their worship aids, or their holy transubstantiated hymn sandwiches for Mass. There are no repercussions or penalties for using hymns which have been delisted or negatively reviewed there. I suggest that we remove the section entirely, or if it must stay, not characterize this as a rejection or prohibition of use, because it is not. Elizium23 (talk) 05:31, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply