Talk:Letter Boxed

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 9 February 2024 by reviewer The Herald (talk · contribs).

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (13 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Reference ideas for Letter Boxed

Notability

Latest comment: 22 days ago3 comments2 people in discussion

As much as I love the NYT games, I don't see a reason for Letter Boxed to have its own article, as I struggle to believe it meets WP:General notability. All the sources here are either NYT primary sources or articles about the NYT games section as a whole (with the only exception being the one Polygon article). This article should probably be folded into The New York Times Games. BanjoZebra (talk) 21:08, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

One could make the same argument for some of the other games in The New York Times Games too (Strands perhaps more so than Letter Boxed). That said, to my mind, we're over the WP:N line with the sources we have here (just). Given the significance that this aspect of the NYT business model seems to have taken (see Vanity Fair), I'd be inclined to keep it as we have it for now and see how the whole group of articles evolves. -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to go ahead remove the maintenance tag for the time being. It seems to me that we have enough to justify the stand-alone article (even if just barely). Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 08:08, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic